again brings a CDU member of the public spotlight, by the CDU should be better separated than later: the current CDU Bundestag member Henry N.
The occasion this time: On his website published the campaign slogan "Work, Family, Fatherland" and confessed to the "Lusatian Observations" to the fact that he knew from the start around the historic background that the slogan of the Chief of the French Vichy regime, Henri Philippe Pétain, dates.
top of that, it was also Motto of the NPD national party congress last year.
All this would "disturb" me, but I would not be a reason for excitement, for the use of language should not be foreign to be determined much by extreme right-wing abuses of language.
The slogan "in itself" is indeed for backward-looking thinking, because the "mother countries" were not accidental high wear on morale and people, what the fatherland fanatics is growing recognition only on the battlefield, for which a shot is in the leg is much better than a bullet in the head.
does not matter. may want to live with such nonsense, the CDU, if she likes. But with Henry N. they should pay attention a bit more for he overtook the slogan is too much outdated context and xenophobia, which the CDU should not afford any more. Especially not with federal mandate.
An example from the box sayings by Henry N.: In an interview Nitzsche had described it as "futile", "the votes of naturalized Turks courting." Rather would a Muslim "rotting away the hand" when he chose the CDU.
There was outrage - which otherwise come into the spotlight right-wing extremists - and he "apologized", as has been because his Bundestag mandate subject for the next term of an apology.
The CDU in Saxony has apparently no better people? Then they should close down, because if they do not want to be eligible for Muslims, it is good not as a party for a pluralist constitutional order.
"Over the top?" No, not really, because the CDU could throw him out. And this is what it should.
There are after all Muslims in the opposition parties, but the CDU must be open to more clearly for Muslims, otherwise they provoked "Islamic parties" and detrimental to the integration of our Gesellschaft.Ich surprised me anyway, that as yet no "IDPD" are ( = "Islamic Democratic Party of Germany") or an "ISU" (= "Islamic Social Union") etc.
Greetings Sven>> DISCUSSION
0 comments:
Post a Comment