The "C" stands for Christian, but Christians in the CDU / CSU are probably of little better than the non-party Christians and Christians of other parties.
The "C" claim and obligation.
people that such a claim Should make can always remember it and measure.
example: Would Jesus sit down in a bomber?
whom "make Christian politics" as a claim is too high, because "without a sword" is not to make policy, it seems to me, is this / his policies but not "Christian" name. That would remain false labeling and also from religious point of view of the abuse of God cover (see 1.Gebot).
to "C" is also the question of whether a people's party should be defined at all religious - or think you would have conditions to ensure that an "M" party (= Muslim party) does not compete politically automatically, but cooperates . What would the CDU members mean when a "Muslim party" established? How would Christians feel if they are to join a Muslim party? How do you feel Muslims are to join the "C" Union?
Who sensitivity to such questions? It needs it. Otherwise, works no integration policy.
In other words, I consider it within the meaning of Christianity is not desirable that the parties are committed all sorts of vile and power struggles and missiles are to seek religious titles.
And I think religious denominations not to be compatible / consistent with the required secularity of the state.
clubs may be called that, but not parties whose Selbstvertändnisse and constitutional role offered to the secular state are required.
Humanity learned in recent decades, added a lot. We also learned German to do so. Thus, one should have the power of love is meant habits to adopt when they are not so fond of, but unnecessarily split the society.
-markus rabanus-2001/2008>> discussion
0 comments:
Post a Comment