On Friday last week there was again a case of grievous bodily harm. Along with insult. So nothing special. Except the following: the judge called me a few weeks ago already, because in case a warrant rumdümpelte, which should have been announced. He also wanted the trial . Discuss your But in the warrant delivery date I could not explain the then competent judge many things based on the Act and therefore waived on the announcement. Good. In any case, the judge called in a few weeks ago and have "agreed" with me as a defender on a unstress negotiation without a fight and admission of evidence with the result that - the act happened in 2005! - Would get out of probation. OK. So I had the least understood and I find the phone in my opinion. Then today we have negotiated and containing the victim witnesses "interviewed schonenend. The plea by the prosecution against the trainee is still expressly mentioned positive prognosis. But forget the word probation. I thought, ok. If a trainee. The judge will sort things out. . But the forgot the word in the sentence suspended sentence
Following the close of the trial the judge I said on the call, but what he - if it's no wonder - unlike remembered. But we hold no legal right call.
bottom line for me: with this judge I will definitely never call prior to trial. Only as a legal discussion in the minutes. How to do nothing. ... . But that's just the risk from phone calls.
The assistance of the witnesses while still present with Robe is already in the hall was no longer worth mentioning.
0 comments:
Post a Comment