today again accused the prosecution of serious bodily harm. The client maintained his innocence. He was the victim, the alleged victim witnesses had rendered him and severely injured. The victim witnesses were all heard. And if I counted correctly, each victim at least seven contradictions in comparison to the police statement presented to the court. The only neutral witness - police officer - described then, that the accused, the "mob of aggressors" was far inferior and essentially bleeding heavily sought protection. Therefore, it was clear that the victim witnesses denied had, and still bad. Conclusion.
acquittal If you are already denied, you should at least make an effort. It is better to stick with the truth. Because there is usually no contradictory statements
0 comments:
Post a Comment